Template talk:LegendLoc: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
==Deletion==
==Deletion==
I find this quite unnecessary. The locations included here are quite arbitrary, it mixes different versions of the legendarium and gives poetic concepts a weird importance. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 15:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I find this quite unnecessary. The locations included here are quite arbitrary, it mixes different versions of the legendarium and gives poetic concepts a weird importance. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 15:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
:If no one disagrees, I'll proceed to its deletion. Those [[Caverns of the Oaritsi]] are getting me nervous. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 13:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:18, 22 October 2021

I think it can be useful to have such a template (in order to easily find similar articles). However, I'm not sure about what to include. Right now I've only tried to include locations which are clearly legendary within the legendarium. A possibility is also to include locations of disputed canon, for example the Desert of Lostladen.--Morgan 12:40, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Perhaps Category:Non-canon Locations is enough for the latter.--Morgan 12:49, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deletion

I find this quite unnecessary. The locations included here are quite arbitrary, it mixes different versions of the legendarium and gives poetic concepts a weird importance. --LorenzoCB 15:19, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

If no one disagrees, I'll proceed to its deletion. Those Caverns of the Oaritsi are getting me nervous. --LorenzoCB 13:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]