Talk:Timeline: Difference between revisions
(Need people's opinions!) |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== A More Accurate Timeline? == | == A More Accurate Timeline? == | ||
I found this [http://www.princeton.edu/~msamberg/tolkien/elder.html timeline] for the Elder Days that looks much more accurate. Would anyone object to replacing the info here for the other Elder Days timeline? --[[User:Ebakunin|Ebakunin]] 00:50, 10 July 2006 (EDT) | I found this [http://www.princeton.edu/~msamberg/tolkien/elder.html timeline] for the Elder Days that looks much more accurate. Would anyone object to replacing the info here for the other Elder Days timeline? --[[User:Ebakunin|Ebakunin]] 00:50, 10 July 2006 (EDT) | ||
:Fine by me, although maybe we could make a quick run through to make sure they didn't leave anything out that we already have, otherwise it looks great. I'm not sure copying it entirely would be the most legal thing either, maybe we can rewrite it in our own words. --[[User:Hyarion|Hyarion]] 09:26, 10 July 2006 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 13:26, 10 July 2006
Just discovered this when searching for Goldilocks Gardner...
One simple yet life-altering question: should this timeline have any other links in it? *dreads* --Bokkie 18:52, 9 Sep 2005 (EDT)
FA Errors
There are two of the year 471! [Just copy 'n pasted from Halion's Excel file "Tale of Years" I guess ;)]
Isn't Saelind (born 344) the same person as Andreth (born 361)? [Couldn't find the both of them in the Indices of the Silm or UT. btw.]
Non-canon
I had an idea that I wanted to make sure it was fine before I did it. Many of the dates are disputed. Perhaps an asterisk could be added to those ones? --Narfil Palùrfalas 21:50, 9 June 2006 (EDT)
- Great idea! Maybe later we can delve in deeper as to the range and other possibilities for the date but I think an asterisk would be a great addition to let people know its not an exact fact. --Hyarion 22:07, 9 June 2006 (EDT)
A More Accurate Timeline?
I found this timeline for the Elder Days that looks much more accurate. Would anyone object to replacing the info here for the other Elder Days timeline? --Ebakunin 00:50, 10 July 2006 (EDT)
- Fine by me, although maybe we could make a quick run through to make sure they didn't leave anything out that we already have, otherwise it looks great. I'm not sure copying it entirely would be the most legal thing either, maybe we can rewrite it in our own words. --Hyarion 09:26, 10 July 2006 (EDT)
