Talk:Mablung

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 5 February 2021 by Mith in topic Infobox Image
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Move

To Mablung? The disambiguation page already recognises that this is a more "popular" Mablung. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:20, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:43, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

History

I need help on this: I added info from a late manuscript, explaining the meaning of Mablung's name, first quoted in The Shaping of Middle-earth (p. 187). Now, I'm not sure where to best add it in the TG version of Mablung's story (as it doesn't seem to fit anywhere neatly) — does anyone happen to have any ideas? --Morgan 19:23, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'm not entirely sure I understand the problem? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 14:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Infobox Image

I was wondering if File:Natalie Chen - Mablung.jpg would work better in the infobox here or not. It is a better image, in my opinion, but I am not sure about the sizing. Any thoughts? --Grace18 23:24, 31 January 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I agree. --IvarTheBoneless 08:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Disagree. The sizing is not appropiate for the infobox.--LorenzoCB 09:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Maybe if it was re-uploaded with more fitting proportions? I already edited it on my PC, just waiting for feedback from others. --IvarTheBoneless 10:08, 1 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
What about the image change discussion, because I tend to agree with Grace. --IvarTheBoneless 18:14, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with LorenzoCB that the image by Natalie Chen is an inappropriate size. I also like the current image as it is different from the most of the featured imagery in infoboxes: it is nice to have some black and white occasionally. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 18:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]