Talk:Dale (Kingdom): Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 21 June 2020 by Kulid123 in topic Merge?
(→Merge?) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:The way I see it, I don't think it should be merged because both articles have different purposes as it says in the disambiguation on the top one talks about the city and one talks about the political entity. I see it like Venice and Republic of Venice if that makes sense. [[User:Gaetano|Gaetano]] 00:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC) | :The way I see it, I don't think it should be merged because both articles have different purposes as it says in the disambiguation on the top one talks about the city and one talks about the political entity. I see it like Venice and Republic of Venice if that makes sense. [[User:Gaetano|Gaetano]] 00:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
::Right...but the thing is, it never existed as a kingdom; its rulers merely ruled over one political entity with two different titles. Besides, the histories of both articles were anyways identical. It is reduntant to keep both. All the political history is anyways included on that article. Also, the cultural history should be in the article for the "Men of Dale". Just a thought.--[[User:Kulid123|Kulid123]] 03:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:44, 21 June 2020
Merge?
Should this page and the other Dale page be merged? I feel like it'll serve a better purpose as being 1 page with all the information in one page. Besides, the location is always refeered to as being just "Dale" and never the "Kingdom of Dale". The only difference is that earlier they were ruled by the "Lord of Dale" and later the "King of Dale". What do y'all think?--Kulid123 18:05, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
- That's good. I'll get right to it.--Kulid123 19:48, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- Oh damn, I already did it. If you wanna undo it go ahead. My bad. Only saw this after.--Kulid123 21:23, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
- The way I see it, I don't think it should be merged because both articles have different purposes as it says in the disambiguation on the top one talks about the city and one talks about the political entity. I see it like Venice and Republic of Venice if that makes sense. Gaetano 00:46, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
- Right...but the thing is, it never existed as a kingdom; its rulers merely ruled over one political entity with two different titles. Besides, the histories of both articles were anyways identical. It is reduntant to keep both. All the political history is anyways included on that article. Also, the cultural history should be in the article for the "Men of Dale". Just a thought.--Kulid123 03:44, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
