Talk:Glingal and Belthil: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 27 June 2020 by LorenzoCB
(Created page with "Would be useful to have only one article for the two trees of Gondolin? Like "Glingal and Belthil". They are mostly mentioned together, and I was about to include OVOTL, as BOLT ...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Would be useful to have only one article for the two trees of Gondolin? Like "Glingal and Belthil". They are mostly mentioned together, and I was about to include OVOTL, as BOLT has more info than any other version, but I would be writing the same in both. I'm just wondering. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 23:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC) | Would be useful to have only one article for the two trees of Gondolin? Like "Glingal and Belthil". They are mostly mentioned together, and I was about to include OVOTL, as BOLT has more info than any other version, but I would be writing the same in both. I'm just wondering. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 23:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC) | ||
:Yes, I agree that it would be useful.--[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
::I also agree. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 10:00, 27 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
:::Done :) Sad we don't have images. --[[User:LorenzoCB|LorenzoCB]] 22:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:13, 27 June 2020
Would be useful to have only one article for the two trees of Gondolin? Like "Glingal and Belthil". They are mostly mentioned together, and I was about to include OVOTL, as BOLT has more info than any other version, but I would be writing the same in both. I'm just wondering. --LorenzoCB 23:11, 24 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree that it would be useful.--Morgan 21:20, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Done :) Sad we don't have images. --LorenzoCB 22:13, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
