Talk:Fall of Dol Guldur: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 21 June 2020 by Kulid123 in topic Rename
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 5: Line 5:


::I agree with the rename, although we could use the "Fall of..." naming for other destructions that aren't named. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 09:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
::I agree with the rename, although we could use the "Fall of..." naming for other destructions that aren't named. [[User:Sage|Sage]] 09:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)
:::I agree with the rename as well. Also, for battles with such little information, such as this one, is an infobox really necessary? Because all the information in the infobox would already be in the article rendering the infobox useless in a battle with little information. Just a thought.--[[User:Kulid123|Kulid123]] 15:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 15:32, 21 June 2020

Rename[edit source]

Accept this term isn't used in The Lord of the Rings, but in Appendix B it is described as "destruction of Dol Guldur", so I propose moving this article to that. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:27, 15 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Personally, I prefer it as it is now (same goes to Amon Sul). Gaetano 23:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with the rename, although we could use the "Fall of..." naming for other destructions that aren't named. Sage 09:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I agree with the rename as well. Also, for battles with such little information, such as this one, is an infobox really necessary? Because all the information in the infobox would already be in the article rendering the infobox useless in a battle with little information. Just a thought.--Kulid123 15:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]