User talk:2.86.255.128: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 3 January 2017 by Ederchil in topic Edits
Line 18: Line 18:
== Tolkien Gateway and The Hobbit film ==
== Tolkien Gateway and The Hobbit film ==


I would like to say something about the relationship of this wiki (Tolkien Gateway) with The Hobbit film Trilogy. I have noticed that in whatever has to do with The Hobbit film Trilogy, Tolkien Gateway is so poor.Especially in comparison with The Lord of the Rings Film Trilogy. I mean there are not so many images uploaded here about places and creatures that were depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy in comparison with The Lord of the Rings , such us wereworms, Carrock, Mirkwood, Rhosgobel, Elvenking's Halls, Lake-Town, Gundabad, Ravenhill,High Pass etc.For example, there is no image with the wereworms as they appeard in The Hobbit film Trilogy.Neither a concept art image from The Hobbit film Trilogy about these creatures or even a fan-made image  based on this film.Why? There is no image, Official or unofficial about Carrock as it was depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy.It is not said so much things about places that were depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy but not in The Lord of the Rings, as opposed to places that were depicted in  The Lord of the Rings, even only in The Lord of the Rings.For example on [[Minas Tirith]] page it is said much things about how Peter Jackson and the producers of The Lord of the Rings  staged/set up this place for The Lord of the Rings, as opposed to the Hobbit, where only for Mirkwood it said about how it was staged/set up and not so much things about it in comparison to the places that appeared in The Lord of the Rings.For some places such us,the Forest Gate, The Hobbit  film trilogy is not even said at all.You could keep this informaton about Lake-Town (how it was set up for The Hobbit film trilogy). You have to correct it generally.Do you understand what I am saying?
I would like to say something about the relationship of this wiki (Tolkien Gateway) with The Hobbit film Trilogy. I have noticed that in whatever has to do with The Hobbit film Trilogy, Tolkien Gateway is so poor.Especially in comparison with The Lord of the Rings Film Trilogy. I mean there are not so many images uploaded here about places and creatures that were depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy in comparison with The Lord of the Rings , such us wereworms, Carrock, Mirkwood, Rhosgobel, Elvenking's Halls, Lake-Town, Gundabad, Ravenhill,High Pass etc.For example, there is no image with the wereworms as they appeard in The Hobbit film Trilogy.Neither a concept art image from The Hobbit film Trilogy about these creatures or even a fan-made image  based on this film.Why? There is no image, Official or unofficial about Carrock as it was depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy.It is not said so much things about places that were depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy but not in The Lord of the Rings, as opposed to places that were depicted in  The Lord of the Rings, even only in The Lord of the Rings.For example on [[Minas Tirith]] page it is said much things about how Peter Jackson and the producers of The Lord of the Rings  staged/set up this place for The Lord of the Rings, as opposed to the Hobbit, where only for Mirkwood it said about how it was staged/set up and not so much things about it in comparison to the places that appeared in The Lord of the Rings.For some places such us,the Forest Gate, The Hobbit  film trilogy is not even said at all.You could keep this informaton about Lake-Town (how it was set up for The Hobbit film trilogy). You have to correct it generally.Is it understood what I am saying?

Revision as of 02:47, 4 January 2017

Welcome to Tolkien Gateway, the J.R.R. Tolkien encyclopedia! If you have an account, please remember to log in. If you don't have an account, remember you don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Tolkien Gateway, but creating an account is quick, free and non-intrusive, requires no personal information, and gives you many benefits, including:

  • The use of a username of your choice
  • Your own user page
  • Your own talk page which, if you choose, also allows users to send you messages without knowing your e-mail address
  • The ability to view all your contributions via a "My contributions" link
  • The use of your own personal watchlist to which you can add articles that interest you
  • The ability to rename pages
  • The ability to upload images
  • The ability to customize the appearance and behaviour of the website
  • The right to be attend Tolkien Gateway meetings.
  • Your IP address will no longer be visible to other users.

We would love to have you join the community so please create an account. --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Edits

I cleaned up the majority, and reverted a number. Not because they were wrong, but because they were so poorly written rewriting it would add nothing but a simple sentence. --Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 18:14, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tolkien Gateway and The Hobbit film

I would like to say something about the relationship of this wiki (Tolkien Gateway) with The Hobbit film Trilogy. I have noticed that in whatever has to do with The Hobbit film Trilogy, Tolkien Gateway is so poor.Especially in comparison with The Lord of the Rings Film Trilogy. I mean there are not so many images uploaded here about places and creatures that were depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy in comparison with The Lord of the Rings , such us wereworms, Carrock, Mirkwood, Rhosgobel, Elvenking's Halls, Lake-Town, Gundabad, Ravenhill,High Pass etc.For example, there is no image with the wereworms as they appeard in The Hobbit film Trilogy.Neither a concept art image from The Hobbit film Trilogy about these creatures or even a fan-made image based on this film.Why? There is no image, Official or unofficial about Carrock as it was depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy.It is not said so much things about places that were depicted in The Hobbit film Trilogy but not in The Lord of the Rings, as opposed to places that were depicted in The Lord of the Rings, even only in The Lord of the Rings.For example on Minas Tirith page it is said much things about how Peter Jackson and the producers of The Lord of the Rings staged/set up this place for The Lord of the Rings, as opposed to the Hobbit, where only for Mirkwood it said about how it was staged/set up and not so much things about it in comparison to the places that appeared in The Lord of the Rings.For some places such us,the Forest Gate, The Hobbit film trilogy is not even said at all.You could keep this informaton about Lake-Town (how it was set up for The Hobbit film trilogy). You have to correct it generally.Is it understood what I am saying?