Tolkien Gateway:Requests for adminship/Archive: Difference between revisions
From Tolkien Gateway
Mithrennaith (talk | contribs) m (→Support: fixes) |
m (Added archive boilerplate) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
: | {{shortcut|TG:RFA/A|TG:RFA/ARCHIVE}} | ||
<table style="border: 1px solid #c0c090; background-color: #f8eaba; width:80%; margin-left: auto; margin-right:auto;"><tr> <td rowspan="2">[[Image:Archive.png|50px|link=]]</td><td>This is an '''archive''' of past [[Tolkien Gateway:Featured articles|requests for adminship]] discussions. '''Do not edit the contents of this page.''' If you wish to start a new discussion, please do so on the [[Tolkien Gateway:Requests for adminship|current requests for adminship page]].</td></tr></table> | |||
===[[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] (8/5/08)=== | ===[[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] (8/5/08)=== | ||
Line 19: | Line 20: | ||
====Nominee's acceptance==== | ====Nominee's acceptance==== | ||
:Of course. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 02:33, 7 August 2008 (EDT) | :Of course. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 02:33, 7 August 2008 (EDT) | ||
===[[User:Mith|Mith]] (28/06/10)=== | |||
Two week deadline from first request (12/07/10). | |||
====Support==== | |||
#I believe that this Wiki needs more sysops, and I believe [[User:Mith|Mith]] meets and exceeds all of the requirements listed above. As we discussed in the last meeting, adminship should not be seen as a promotion, rather a responsibility; I'm confident [[User:Mith|Mith]] will be able to meet the needs of this responsibility.--{{User:KingAragorn/sig}} 21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
#Ditto. '''Agree'''. -- {{User:Ederchil/sig}} 21:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
#Agree. --[[User:Morgan|Morgan]] 21:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
#'''Agree'''. — [[User:Mithrennaith|Mithrennaith]] 22:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
#'''I agree''' --[[User:Amroth|Amroth]] 14:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
#'''Agree''' -- [[User:Eldarion Telcontar|Eldarion Telcontar]] 19:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
====Oppose==== | |||
====Neutral/comments==== | |||
====Nominee's acceptance==== | |||
*Of course. And thank you to all those who have nominated me so far. --{{User:Mith/sig}} 22:33, 29 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
[[Category:Tolkien Gateway]] |
Revision as of 16:10, 23 August 2014
This is an archive of past requests for adminship discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion, please do so on the current requests for adminship page. |
Ederchil (8/5/08)
Two week deadline from first request
Support
- OK, Tolkien Gateway, the time has come. King Aragorn has made a good point about Hyarion's recent vacation, and I have always felt that there needed to be another admin on TG. If anything happened to Hy, TG would be crippled. I therefore nominate the first among the recent vacation triumvirate, Ederchil. He has shown himself worthy, an enforcer of TG standards, and a defender against outside disruptions. --Theoden1 21:40, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
- I agree, Hyarion is doing a great job, but if anything were to happen, I think Tolkien Gateway would be in good hands with Ederchil.--Quidon88 22:01, 5 August 2008 (EDT)
- I fully agree. --Þelma 04:49, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
- I certainly agree, for all reasons previously stated. Good luck!-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 06:03, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
- If anyone can do it I personally agree that Ederchil is the person to do it.--User:High King Fingolfin/High King Fingolfin 23:10, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
- I agree, in the time I've been looking in here (and wanting to become much more active, but not finding the time for it), I have noticed Ederchil is always in evidence as keeping things in order somewhere. And must support my fellow countryman ;) -- Mithrennaith 22:01, 12 August 2008 (EDT)
- I agree, Ederchil has shown no signs of slowing down in activity and continues to contribute high quality content. Ederchil's opinions seem to always mirror my own and I see no reason why he wouldn't make a great administrator. —Unsigned comment by Hyarion (talk • contribs). 21:02, 17 August 2008.
Oppose
Neutral/comments
Nominee's acceptance
- Of course. -- Ederchil 02:33, 7 August 2008 (EDT)
Mith (28/06/10)
Two week deadline from first request (12/07/10).
Support
- I believe that this Wiki needs more sysops, and I believe Mith meets and exceeds all of the requirements listed above. As we discussed in the last meeting, adminship should not be seen as a promotion, rather a responsibility; I'm confident Mith will be able to meet the needs of this responsibility.-- KingAragorn talk contribs edits email 21:14, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Ditto. Agree. -- Ederchil (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 21:17, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. --Morgan 21:22, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- Agree. — Mithrennaith 22:20, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
- I agree --Amroth 14:09, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
- Agree -- Eldarion Telcontar 19:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)