Talk:The Atlas of Middle-earth: Difference between revisions

From Tolkien Gateway
Latest comment: 15 July 2014 by Olwe in topic Third edition
m (Bot Message: changing link to Guide to the Names in The Lord of the Rings)
Line 7: Line 7:


::Maybe a rewrite is necessary. I don't like articles that have a bulk of text first and their first section header at the bottom. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 05:41, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
::Maybe a rewrite is necessary. I don't like articles that have a bulk of text first and their first section header at the bottom. -- [[User:Ederchil|Ederchil]] 05:41, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
==Third edition==
Did the 3rd edition add anything new or was it just a reprint? --[[User:Olwe|Olwe]] 15:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:28, 15 July 2014

Oakbottom

I added that one to Oatbarton some time ago, but can't find reference anymore. It's spelled correctly on 70-1.

Also useful might be the inclusion of Tarnost on pp 88-9, and the inclusion of "Sackville" as a town name (70-1). And maybe something about "things that are now shown to be incorrect", like Hardbottle. Fonstad placed it in the SF, but Nomenclature placed it in the NF. -- Ederchil 04:56, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

I am not aware of these, so I would love it if you could make the additions. Also, I am afraid if the article is a bit too negative. I really love this book. Sage 05:27, 6 August 2008 (EDT)
Maybe a rewrite is necessary. I don't like articles that have a bulk of text first and their first section header at the bottom. -- Ederchil 05:41, 6 August 2008 (EDT)

Third edition

Did the 3rd edition add anything new or was it just a reprint? --Olwe 15:28, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]