Talk:Fall of Mount Gundabad

From Tolkien Gateway
Revision as of 06:12, 6 January 2013 by Dwarf Lord (talk | contribs) (moved Talk:First Sack of Gundabad to Talk:Fall of Mount Gundabad: I originally named this as a sacking, but have decided that due to the definition of a armed sacking this title does not fit. Since the place fell to an invader the title will ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 14 July 2011 by Morgan in topic Name
The printable version is no longer supported and may have rendering errors. Please update your browser bookmarks and please use the default browser print function instead.

Huh, where does this info come from? I know of the mention in Of Dwarves and Men, but as far as I can understand what is told there is not exactly this detailed: "...it's occupation in the Third Age by the Orks of Sauron..."? --Haltiamieli 08:16, 16 September 2007 (EDT)


I don't totally remember where I got all of the info, but I know don't try to post anything without something to back it up. --Dwarf Lord 11:16, 15 November 2007 (EST)

Ok, hope you can find the source as I'd like very much to know about it too. :) Anything on Dwarves and Second Age is quite scarce, to say the least. --Haltiamieli 11:54, 15 November 2007 (EST)


I found the info, Halt. It is in the Peoples of Middle-earth pages 301 and 305. Which seem to conclude that Orcs invaded the mountain and drove the Dwarves away. --Dwarf Lord 20:45, 26 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks. I'll look at it when I get back home in the weekend. :) --Haltiamieli 09:27, 28 December 2007 (EST)

Name

Sack or Sacking? --Mith (Talk/Contribs/Edits) 19:07, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Since the source doesn't have a title for the event (and doesn't use the word "sack", from what I could see), I don't have any opinion in this matter (I guess the native English-speakers should decide what sounds best).--Morgan 19:12, 14 July 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]